On 11-Jun-10 12:34:36, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> So either something has changed the numerical encoding of \[ua] in >>> groff (but despite searching I have found no clue), or possibly the >>> input characters "\[ua]" were mis-interpreted as "\[uA]". Could >>> this have something to do with locale? >> >> It doesn't seem to be as simple as them being the same letters with >> only case distinguishing. [...] > > I'll have a look. > Werner
As a possible further clue: I've run the same test now on a couple of really old machines, wth earlier versions of groff. Both gave the correct result: GNU troff version 1.10 GNU troff version 1.16.1 Ted. -------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk> Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 11-Jun-10 Time: 14:05:31 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
