Hi, Werner wrote: > Well, they've solved a particular problem, and the current groff can't > replace this particular need so I can understand that they don't want > to upgrade. Do complain more to them: maybe someone at Debian gets > interested enough (as Bruno Haible was) to add proper CJK support > based on Unicode.
Or perhaps they could package it up into two packages, a `vanilla' GNU groff and and older one with their CJK support. You couldn't have both installed at the same time but people could choose. Cheers, Ralph.
