> I apologise if my previous post sounded like a criticism of groff -- > it was not intended to be.
No problem. However, I encourage all interested people to contribute and help. > However, it is truly frustrating for all concerned when The Debian > Way turns out to be the wrong way because, as you are aware, The > Debian Way does not concede the possibility of error in itself. :-) Well, they've solved a particular problem, and the current groff can't replace this particular need so I can understand that they don't want to upgrade. Do complain more to them: maybe someone at Debian gets interested enough (as Bruno Haible was) to add proper CJK support based on Unicode. Werner
