> In fact, even Groff hasn't applied patches submitted almost a year > ago; see > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2004-05/msg00206.html
Kees, your patch looks fine. To include it, I need papers from you (a request has been sent separately). BTW, have you ever had a look at `progreloc.c' in the gnulib CVS (on Savannah)? I wonder whether it makes sense to use this `canonical' source code instead... Werner _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff