> In fact, even Groff hasn't applied patches submitted almost a year
> ago; see
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2004-05/msg00206.html
Kees,


your patch looks fine.  To include it, I need papers from you (a
request has been sent separately).  BTW, have you ever had a look at
`progreloc.c' in the gnulib CVS (on Savannah)?  I wonder whether it
makes sense to use this `canonical' source code instead...


    Werner


_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff

Reply via email to