On 17-03-2021, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:28 AM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can you provide any proof that there was an open public discussion? > > What kind of proof would you find to be acceptable? Can you give an > example of something that I could say that you would consider to be a > good answer to that question? Thanks.
It is still possible to write a formal proposal "canceling generics" if someone find now a good reason, right ? (at the time of modules i believe it was). Thanks for your patience > > Ian > > > >> ср, 17 мар. 2021 г. в 02:12, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org>: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:51 AM Space A. <reexist...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > (To be clear, your original claim was that there *was* no discussion - >>> > > which is at least easy to address, because it's clearly not true. There >>> > > was over three years of active discussion on this) >>> > >>> > No, and I can repeat, there was no (public) discussion on whether the >>> > idea of generics in Go should be completely dropped. It *was* always a >>> > "discussion" of how to improve and implement generics in a Go way, but >>> > not of generics themselves as something to be avoided by all means. >>> >>> I'm sorry, but that simply isn't the case. Many different people at >>> many different times suggested that the idea of adding generics should >>> be dropped. Those ideas were discussed, supported, opposed, and so >>> forth. It's been a long discussion over many years. >>> >>> Ian > -- wilk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/s2vc5m%24sgd%241%40ciao.gmane.io.
