On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 7:16 PM Zakaria bin Haris <z4k4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Idk if this has been proposed or discussed before.
>
> Given the last error handling abbreviation proposal is rejected. How about
> some simple syntactic sugar like this:
>
> rin Something()
>
> Which is just a sugar for:
>
> if err := Something(); err != nil {
> return err
> }
>
> To make it worth the new keyword make it so that:
>
> rin v := Something()
>
> equals to:
>
> v, err := Something()
> if err != nil {
> return err
> }
This is similar to the check/handle design draft, without the handle.
You may want to take a look at https://golang.org/issue/40432.
Thanks.
Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcU5C4F-m_YPsPtxuPmt5TQrJnXN2QK4dGBONkYD1iKyww%40mail.gmail.com.
