For completeness if the function is something like:
func x() (data *Data, err error) {
}
then *rinn* should be smart enough to assign error to err variable and just
do return instead return err
On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 9:19:48 AM UTC+7 Zakaria bin Haris wrote:
> Sorry, I mean return if not nil, so it should be *rinn* or please find
> some better keyword for this :^).
>
> On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 9:15:31 AM UTC+7 Zakaria bin Haris wrote:
>
>> Hi, gophers!
>>
>> Idk if this has been proposed or discussed before.
>>
>> Given the last error handling abbreviation proposal is rejected. How
>> about some simple syntactic sugar like this:
>>
>> *rin* Something()
>>
>> Which is just a sugar for:
>>
>> if err := Something(); err != nil {
>> return err
>> }
>>
>> To make it worth the new keyword make it so that:
>>
>> *rin* v := Something()
>>
>> equals to:
>>
>> v, err := Something()
>> if err != nil {
>> return err
>> }
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/b5ad3bb6-74e7-45df-b82a-ef199b058a4en%40googlegroups.com.
