Dear,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020, 4:16 AM Zakaria bin Haris <z4k4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, gophers!
>
> Idk if this has been proposed or discussed before.
>
> Given the last error handling abbreviation proposal is rejected. How about
> some simple syntactic sugar like this:
>
> *rin* Something()
>
I love the consistency and the one way of doing things. It's indeed boring
to write 'if err ! nil', but I don't like the try catch either. Being
explicit is actually nice and errors as part of return values is more easy
to reason about.
I would rather pollute my code with if err than having two ways for return.
> Which is just a sugar for:
>
> if err := Something(); err != nil {
> return err
> }
>
> To make it worth the new keyword make it so that:
>
> *rin* v := Something()
>
> equals to:
>
> v, err := Something()
> if err != nil {
> return err
> }
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/955d78f2-67cb-4940-845c-034fb45e816an%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/955d78f2-67cb-4940-845c-034fb45e816an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAHrL7wHOD-eB%3D7A5C%3DtWW-wAPemBhXB09xQdocUwb87N1uveLQ%40mail.gmail.com.
