On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:58 AM 'Carla Pfaff' via golang-nuts < golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 August 2020 at 01:33:59 UTC+2 Patrick Smith wrote: > >> if we think it likely that a future version of Go will allow operator >> overloading >> > > That's highly unlikely: https://golang.org/doc/faq#overloading > That seems like a very strong reading of "it seems more a convenience than an absolute requirement. Again, things are simpler without it". In particular, generics change the equation for its usefulness (as discussed in this thread). I'm not saying Go *will* get operator overloading or even that it *should* get it, but I don't think that FAQ-section is an argument that it *won't*. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/eb62bd8d-9310-4eb4-8125-bebda7bd6594n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/eb62bd8d-9310-4eb4-8125-bebda7bd6594n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfHv2FAegr-AmsSsHxriAJvidLLcxKuteOx9qKVW6upudg%40mail.gmail.com.
