On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 9:16 AM Eric Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> And that's the insight that led be to the extension I proposed. I asked 
> myself what the most natural way to pass out a soft close might be.

If you're proposing combining generators and exceptions, be aware of
how complicated the exact semantics can be. Look for what follows `The
statement "RESULT = yield from EXPR" is semantically equivalent to
...` in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0380/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOeFMNXvMpaRJpUQZo3VeQm%2BP0fdgHzrHX-Ov5ik6OH%2BMy_ksA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to