That is one big strawman. I can live without "try" but I think it would be a net gain for the language. Sign of the times that any discussion becomes polarized I guess...
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 12:18 PM Denis Cheremisov <denis.cheremi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think many people like the proposal but are not vocal about it. > > Emoji count should reflect that "silent majority" better than comments. We > have larger negative count on `try` and overwhelming 1293 vs 154 positive > count on leaving it as is. People who care generally dislike poorly thought > `try`, that's it. > > воскресенье, 30 июня 2019 г., 15:47:54 UTC+3 пользователь > pierr...@gmail.com написал: >> >> Indeed. >> >> I think many people like the proposal but are not vocal about it. It is >> not perfect but it *does *bring value to the table if you read the >> proposal in its entirety and think about how you would use/could use it in >> a real life scenario. >> >> I do *decorate *errors a lot, I do care about the *control flow* (I have >> been along time user of *defer *for error handling and find it not >> magical or ugly but fitting beautifully with the language), which are the >> main topics people are complaining about... And I think it actually works >> fine in those situations. >> >> In fact, the try() approach has started growing on me as I write code >> now, I feel it would help in quite a few situations and simplify, not in a >> drastic way, but subtle and valuable one. >> >> My 2c. >> >> Le samedi 29 juin 2019 21:31:19 UTC+2, Henrik Johansson a écrit : >> >>> I for one like the try proposal. It removes much of my gripes with the >>> verbosity of error handling. >>> >>> I think that it will become more readable than explicit error handling >>> quite fast. Note that it is still explicit, if you don't use the try >>> notation the error can be handled as it is now or ignored as it sometimes >>> is now. >>> >>> I have a feeling that there is a quite large "silent majority" that >>> pretty much agrees with me. >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 21:18 Denis Cheremisov <denis.c...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> And prepare for wider audience in shitty “try” proposal after 1 July. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to golan...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c99b3572-427c-4b7d-91ff-2fb4e4cb9177%40googlegroups.com >>>> . >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/49411503-e6f1-4be7-ae39-57b55e782779%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/49411503-e6f1-4be7-ae39-57b55e782779%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAKOF697dWwSHcNi%3DS4ErwLVpEtV%3Dem8UExnQZiLbnpwOUDrkNQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
