I for one like the try proposal. It removes much of my gripes with the verbosity of error handling.
I think that it will become more readable than explicit error handling quite fast. Note that it is still explicit, if you don't use the try notation the error can be handled as it is now or ignored as it sometimes is now. I have a feeling that there is a quite large "silent majority" that pretty much agrees with me. On Sat, Jun 29, 2019, 21:18 Denis Cheremisov <denis.cheremi...@gmail.com> wrote: > And prepare for wider audience in shitty “try” proposal after 1 July. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c99b3572-427c-4b7d-91ff-2fb4e4cb9177%40googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAKOF6978Z_hK2g_2GFDxCzqHQxi5Eeon0N2gOx3dUYbB-TbbYA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
