The “try” proposal is unpopular: 246 dislikes vs 186 likes.

And aforementioned one is highly popular with more than a thousand likes and 
the like/dislike ration is reaching 8 (actual numbers are 1147 likes vs 148 
dislikes).

And you must understand the specific: you are solving relatively hard problems 
developing language called Go with low mistake cost and we are solving simple 
problems with a DSL called Go but our mistake cost is much higher than yours.

Now, there was an excellent example: 

info := try(try(os.File(fileName)).Stat())

We are having file descriptor leak here.

I thought you are trying to be as practical as possible making a language with 
such a retarded yet somehow usable type system in XXI. But this recent proposal 
raises some suspicions...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/40cc7e81-1679-4691-a1a1-f34584ea0929%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to