Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> once said: > This is especially a problem when these proposals further tie Go to > Google web services run by the Go team (though I'm veering off into a > separate problem here). To me this feels like it's almost a type of > vertical integration and it's an absolutely disgusting thing to do, and > I don't use that word lightly. Not because I think the Go team is > planning on doing anything bad with the information all Go users will > now be sending to them, or because I think Google executives are putting > down mandates and influencing Go, but because we don't know what future > Go team members or Google execs will do. We don't know who will be > running the Go project in 10 or 20 years, so the Go team now should be > making sure they limit the potential for abuse, especially when they > work for a company with a long history of anti- competitive behavior and > abuse of its size and power.
How do you square this opinion with the fact that the Go team went out of their way to enable the use of third-party module proxies, something that is good for the community but would be of little practical use to Google? Anthony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/20190523222743.GA28121%40alice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
