On Monday, March 11, 2019, 3:54:56 PM PDT, Robert Engels wrote: > Yes, so use Java - for this synthetic benchmark. I’m not sure what the point is you are trying to make. > Both Java and Go outperform the C and C++ solutions using off the shelf memory management in the binary tree tests.
In what way do Java and Go outperform the C and C++ solutions there? Those Java and Go programs are slower ? <https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/binarytrees.html> > As the real world application demonstrates both Java and Go offer superior performance to C++ in standard use cases. The authors are admirably specific in their recommendation — "Based on our positive experiences, we recommend authors of other bionformatics tools for processing SAM/BAM data, and potentially also other sequencing data formats, to also consider Go as an implementation language." ====== On Monday, March 11, 2019, 4:10:21 PM PDT, Robert Engels wrote: > You are 100% correct - that is why they have exactly 0 value. Nothing to see here, please move on... On the contrary, there is value and there is plenty to see. ====== On Monday, March 11, 2019, 4:17:02 PM PDT, Robert Engels wrote: > Also, you realize that Java has implemented auto vectorization for a long time... I do realize that. (I was using analogy). > But If you want to spend your time coding and debugging C++ or C no one here is stopping you. I won't spend time coding and debugging C++ or C. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
