It should be pointed out that these three implementations have close to zero testing. In the absence of that, there is little that should be drawn from the integration benchmarks that this suggests.
If we relax correct correctness requirements we can get answers in O(1) with small constants. On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 09:05 -0800, 'Isaac Gouy' via golang-nuts wrote: > "We reimplemented elPrep in all three languages and benchmarked > their > runtime performance and memory use. Results: *The Go implementation > performs best*, yielding the best balance between runtime performance > and > memory use. While the Java benchmarks report a somewhat faster > runtime than > the Go benchmarks, the memory use of the Java runs is significantly > higher." > > proggit discussion > <https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/avsfc6/performance_com > parison_of_go_c_and_java_for/> > > article <https://doi.org/10.1101/558056> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
