Thanks for an interesting read! Curious to know if you guys have any estimates on the number of lines, development time and number of bugs for each language implementation? I realize this is subjective but this comparison may be quite meaningful given that the authors had an existing reference implementation of a sort done in CL. It is not often one sees real world examples of multiple implementations done by a small team with the same goals.
Thanks! > On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:05 AM, 'Isaac Gouy' via golang-nuts > <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > "We reimplemented elPrep in all three languages and benchmarked their runtime > performance and memory use. Results: The Go implementation performs best, > yielding the best balance between runtime performance and memory use. While > the Java benchmarks report a somewhat faster runtime than the Go benchmarks, > the memory use of the Java runs is significantly higher." > > proggit discussion > > article > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
