On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:19:13 -0500 Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> So even when using generics you still need to be able to write > understandable code. **need to be able to write understandable code** Yes. This thread is about whether within Go generics proposal this is possible and if not possible - as it seems - how to prevent disaster that might stem from current proposal's adoption. > Go doesn’t need generics, at least not full featured ones. :) Thank you for your support. P.S. > it is not as fast as Java and never will be because it can’t Depends of metrics and requirements. Considering industry's PoV Go so far is the fastest language available. While Java indeed can be faster at code execution, Go can be tenfold faster regarding "dev warmup", compiling, testing and deployment times. And that matters the most to the most of users. It is yet more apparent within product's evolution and maintenance periods. -- Wojciech S. Czarnecki << ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
