On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 04:38:55 -0700 (PDT) ffm2...@web.de wrote: > Every average Joe Java boilerplate coder gets along with generics. Barely, if at all, understanding whats under.
"Smart Copy Paste ... A book for normal programmers" https://www.amazon.com/Smart-Paste-Stack-Overflow-other-ebook/dp/B01EHI5RQM > But even there you can manage without thinking and just doing > trial and error if you wanted to. OP, I and many others want to defend Gol off this very attitude. Go is among few contemporary languages that allows me to fully understand what my resulting binary will do, down to the syscall level. Thats precious. > I think it will neither be tricky to make use of nor to read the code. I claim opposite. All and any Gopher will be expected to cope with hard to read and yet harder to understand generic code. Even if she herself will vowed not to use it. In a short while we all will be obeying first Java's commandment "thou shalt not peek under". -- Wojciech S. Czarnecki << ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
