On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 23:03 jimmy frasche <soapboxcic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't there be an issue with fp := AFunc[int] ? > > Though for that matter I wouldn't mind if the type part were repeated > for instantiations like AFunc[type int] or even AFunc(type int) > > For that matter, always writing type would let you use < > since the > parser could plausibly enter a separate mode when it hit the < token > followed by type. > The parser does not and not easily can know if 'a' in '<a' is a variable or a type name. > -- -j -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
