On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:38 PM, xingtao zhao <zhaoxing...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But we can still using [type T] instead.
That is a very good point. Thanks. As far as I can see we could plausibly switch to square brackets if we prefer them. Ian > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 6:45:07 AM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 5:28 AM, <ffm...@web.de> wrote: >> > >> > Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 13:43:32 UTC+2 schrieb Christophe >> > Meessen: >> >> >> >> I understand your example, but it wouldn't be a problem anymore with a >> >> special character like a $ sign. D use the !. >> > >> > >> > Scala uses [ and ] instead of < and > to avoid the problem that < and > >> > mean >> > something different depending on the context. >> >> Note that simple [ and ] don't work in Go, as explained in the >> generics design draft. >> >> Ian > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
