On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:08 AM, 'Charlton Trezevant' via golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Link: [Getting specific about generics, by Emily > Maier](https://emilymaier.net/words/getting-specific-about-generics/) > > The interface-based alternative to contracts seems like such a natural fit- > It’s simple, straightforward, and pragmatic. I value those aspects of Go’s > philosophy and consider them to be features of the language, so it’s > encouraging to see a solution that suits them so well. The author also does > a great job of contextualizing the use cases and debate around generics, > which I found incredibly helpful. > > Any thoughts?
It's a very nice writeup. It's worth asking how the graph example in the design draft would be implemented in an interface-based implementation. Also the syntactic issues are real. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
