It's a great read, clarified stuff for me. An approach that embraces interfaces feels preferable to me.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, 09:09 'Charlton Trezevant' via golang-nuts, < golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Link: [Getting specific about generics, by Emily Maier]( > https://emilymaier.net/words/getting-specific-about-generics/) > > The interface-based alternative to contracts seems like such a natural > fit- It’s simple, straightforward, and pragmatic. I value those aspects of > Go’s philosophy and consider them to be features of the language, so it’s > encouraging to see a solution that suits them so well. The author also does > a great job of contextualizing the use cases and debate around generics, > which I found incredibly helpful. > > Any thoughts? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
