On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:00 PM T L <tapir....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 12:06:43 AM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:55 PM T L <tapi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > But we can't take addresses of formally declared functions and function
> literals.
>
> Yes, so if you cannot have the function pointer (like in func foo() {}; fp
> := foo) then there is nothing to compare so I don't understand what's the
> connection to comparing of function pointers.
>
>
> We cannot tabke addresses of constants too, but we can compare constants.
>
Constants have value that can be compared to some other value. Above quoted
from your earlier post is the correct observation that one cannot have a
function _value_ of a predeclared function or a function literal. So what
value comparison is now supposed to be analogical to comparing constants?
Put other way: In `if fv == whatever {}`, where the `fv` you are talking
about comes from, such that it has something in common to comparing
constants?
--
-j
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
