On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:35:59 PM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> So, your suggestion is, to have functions be comparable, but have the
> comparisons always be false (unless compared to nil)? How would that be
> useful and *not* completely confusing? e.g. how would that not lead to
> people asking here, once a week, why (os.Open == os.Open) == false or
> something like that?
>
No, I don't os.Open != os.Open, they are the same question, so they are
equal.
I just mean comparing different functions always returns false.
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, T L <tapi...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:53:57 PM UTC+8, Volker Dobler wrote:
>>>
>>> Just one argument out of many: Closures.
>>> x := 3
>>> f1 := func() int {
>>> return x
>>> }
>>> f2 := func() int { return 3 }
>>> // Is f1 == f2 ?
>>>
>>> x = 4
>>> // What now? Still f1 == f2? Or never equal?
>>>
>>>
>> Any bad to think then never equal?
>>
>>
>>
>>> V.
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
