So, your suggestion is, to have functions be comparable, but have the
comparisons always be false (unless compared to nil)? How would that be
useful and *not* completely confusing? e.g. how would that not lead to
people asking here, once a week, why (os.Open == os.Open) == false or
something like that?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:30 PM, T L <tapir....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 9:53:57 PM UTC+8, Volker Dobler wrote:
>>
>> Just one argument out of many: Closures.
>> x := 3
>> f1 := func() int {
>> return x
>> }
>> f2 := func() int { return 3 }
>> // Is f1 == f2 ?
>>
>> x = 4
>> // What now? Still f1 == f2? Or never equal?
>>
>>
> Any bad to think then never equal?
>
>
>
>> V.
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
