I would have expected that aside from informing about general performance, one of the purposes for benchmarks would have been to create pressure for improvement of key features of the laguage, this seems to circumvent this, im not dure what they are trying to achive. Perhaps restrictions on only using the language as distributed and its standard lib would be a healthy constraint to evangelise for.
On 1 Sep 2016 06:53, "Harald Weidner" <hweidner-li...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:44:41AM -0700, 'Eric Johnson' via golang-nuts > wrote: > > > >The Java counterpart of this benchmark does not use the Java build-in > > >maps, but imports a map implementation for fixed data types from the > > >fastutil project. > > > I hadn't noticed that. That would seem to violate the spirit of the test: > > The regex-dna benchmark is even more strange. Neither the measured Go nor > the > Java implementation use the standard regexp libs. The Go program imports > bindings to PCRE, the Java program uses TclRE. > > Harald > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
