I am not sure I agree. Writing them in idiomatic might be good to detect whether idiomatic works for getting fast code, but on the other side, if I am writing a large application, I might use slower, idiomatic code in 90% of it, and then optimize the hell out of the bottlenecks, throwing any elegance over board :). And, as this very benchmarking site is far too often abused to talk down on languages, just because they have some bad test results, we as the Go community should try to get the fastest results there - most other programs are not very idiomatic or reasonable even.
Peter On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Torsten Bronger < bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > YMMV, but if such tests are not written ideomatically, they are > useless in my opinion. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
