Hallöchen! Peter Herth writes:
> I am not sure I agree. Writing them in idiomatic might be good to > detect whether idiomatic works for getting fast code, but on the > other side, if I am writing a large application, I might use > slower, idiomatic code in 90% of it, and then optimize the hell > out of the bottlenecks, throwing any elegance over board :). There is no clear line, but then, "ideomatic" is not clearly defined either. Turbo Pascal used to have an assembler keyword and would have been the fastest language of all. :-) Seriously, if you start generating code as was suggested, the comparison is not helpful anymore. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: torsten.bron...@jabber.rwth-aachen.de -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
