> I would never allow my opinion of what are the "good places" and what > are the "bad places" to enter into a technical discussion. > (On immigration, or on security engineering).
I think you'll have a hard time convincing people that when speaking about human rights activists in North Korea, it's somehow inappropriate to say they're living in a bad place. Repressive governments are real threats to human rights, and it doesn't do anyone any good to pretend otherwise. > Burning it down is not what I was advocating. I am advocating orderly > evacuation and replacement of a system that has clearly outlived its > usefulnesses. No, you're not. Evacuation and replacement requires a replacement exists. The moment you present an alternative that's running and working and stable, *then* we can have a discussion about moving to the exits. > EU legislation, among other things, will see to that. The times are > changing, and nobody is free to keep serving publicly someone else's > private information over the objections of the owner. US keyservers are. The only thing EU regulations will do is end keyservers in the EU. The SKS community has been discussing a considerably worse nightmare scenario for the past seven years. There have been a number of flawed proposals made in that time period. Your time might be better spent perusing the last seven years of sks-devel to learn what has already been proposed and the flaws in each of them. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
