On 26/04/16 23:40, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote: > All good points, no argument. I particularly agree regarding the > frequency. By all means promote your own product if you believe in > it.
I also think it's a good idea if you can read about related software on this list, but I think that authors should be reluctant to promote their own stuff in other threads. With care, it can be done, though. Incidentally, the software will also need to be free software, as per the rules for FSF lists. > However, I stand by my opinion that there should be a clear > demarcation between GnuPG and its official distribution opposed to > applications, utilities, etc that <use> GnuPG and its official > distributed utilities. Yes, I think it would be better if stuff like GPGME, libassuan, libgcrypt, libgpg-error, libksba and pinentry got their own category on the website rather than being a peer to the other stuff in related software... > Their author(s) should not imply that their > project is part of GnuPG. I can't think of an instance where this appeared to be the case, though. Then again, I know what is part of GnuPG and what not, so I might not have noticed indeed. > I just re-checked; egpg is not listed on the gnupg.org 'Download' > page. It is not even listed on the 'Frontends' tab, which I find > somewhat surprising, as that should be the appropriate place to be > listed? While "related software" is a large list, I don't think it's meant to be exhaustive. I'm also not sure what the qualifications are to be considered for being added (other than being free software). I think this is done informally, on an ad-hoc basis. My 2 cents, Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
