-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Peter and All, I completely agree. I think that this "project" is now outside the scope of this group and should either split off into its own group or the author should stop self-promoting. My reading of the group consensus is that this set of scripts is tolerated not endorsed or recommended. I have seen multiple posts specifically warning against practices promulgated by this set of scripts and while there are nothing wrong with experimenting and requesting feedback from the group I personally feel a line is crossed when this group is used as the medium to promote a personal project.
On 4/26/2016 4:32 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 26/04/16 12:52, Dashamir Hoxha wrote: >> A project similar in goals (simplifying GnuPG by automating tasks >> and emphasising best practices) is this one: >> https://github.com/dashohoxha/egpg You can find the answer to >> some of the questions above by looking at its code. > > I think you are taking the "plugging my project" approach too far. > While generating exposure is definitely a good component of making > your project succesful, I think a bit more modesty is in order. If > I had a say in it: Just create your own threads (not too many > please :), don't mention your project in every thread where it has > some common ground. > > This is my personal opinion. I don't get to say what you do. But I > feel the need to express this opinion now. > > Regarding your choice of words and also modesty, the answers to > the questions are not in your code. Your /opinions/ on the matter > are in your code. You do not get to decide what is truth, what is > the answer. Incidentally, the answer is 42, so you're late to the > party... ;P > > I hadn't even read the following until I almost trimmed it from the > mail and it caught my eye... so ... > >> In my opinion, the first thing to be done is to build a .deb >> package for it, so that it can be installed easily on all Debian >> derived systems, then you can also use it in your special Live CD >> system. This is the task about it: >> https://github.com/dashohoxha/egpg/issues/19 > > Wait, wait, wait... I sincerely hope you're not suggesting that > the first thing Daniel Pocock and others need to do is build a .deb > package for your project, that instead you meant this to read as > "the first thing /I/ should do is build a .deb package for egpg", > so that they can play with your code. I wouldn't even agree with > the latter; but the former is just... I hope you can pick your own > adjective. > > Cheers, > > Peter. > - -- Thanks, Bob Cavanaugh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXH69FAAoJENFeiMzlp+pmuucIALiAgIC4l4B0F4FseQ8cO5te urPlzfPkPUYKKQT57yLuURoak1ilaco0ln8HB1IOswos5yFkQFDFLtDhJ+j07ole UjMb0h3VT/Jv3N/zAujIoZoV4kE+eNZKGFbkfMeGi6CHeXXAkTBlWtoFnXU9rwRE 2xovURzmD5dyF8Mn9s61b4QQqiR7XcDgnO0cPQxU1haJZ4NBEDNtEO1kICRTgMdd qOq0XMtvXt/jqL/Gj73fYzuyUuyqAHj4kpb4IyxKlJ8J/xANaCpGmJcusmz2RivJ CIEjRg1Ou00HXsiSV/a27yuKNf5y88OvzWpt4Z7FbVtValL9K8i02otBi048gTo= =7wRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
