> My reading of the group > consensus is that this set of scripts is tolerated not endorsed or > recommended.
Well, yeah, but let's keep in mind the GnuPG community endorses/recommends very little. Not even something like Enigmail gets an endorsement or recommendation from GnuPG. By and large, GnuPG just focuses on GnuPG, and I think that's a good policy that's served everyone well. :) > I personally feel a line is crossed when this group is used as > the medium to promote a personal project. Well, there's a little bit of a chicken-and-the-egg problem here. If new projects are told "don't evangelize here", how will they let users who might be interested in their project know it exists? Evangelization is important. I don't think we want to adopt a no-evangelization rule, but at the same time, we want to keep it within limits, too. We don't have a rule on this subject. I don't think we need one, either. But speaking just for myself, I'd advise people not promote their projects more than every other month. Six announcements a year ought to be plenty to let people know about a new project. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
