On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:57, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > You're looking at FOSS projects that have successfully used GPGME, but
Sure. > that doesn't tell you about proprietary projects that have chosen not to > use GPGME. I've had clients refuse to use GPGME because of the > licensing, even under the LGPLv2.1. (Foolish, I know.) Other times And I have had several hints that it was used anyway and violating the license. But that is another story. If there is a compelling reason to change the license, like to increase the adaption of mail encryption, I am willing to consider that. I am able do that for most of the code but there are some practical drawbacks, like the ability to share code between the other libraries. > I've discovered GPGME doesn't support a particular feature I need, like > discovering the default preference lists that are currently in use. Etc. The bug tracker allows to file feature requests ... Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
