> And that is why this thread is going on, so hopefully we can come to > an agreement that there are many areas where GnuPG can be used but > GPGME is a bad solution to do it.
Maybe I'm a little irritable here, but -- pretty much everyone who's ever hacked on GnuPG has found situations where GPGME isn't a good solution, sometimes for architectural reasons and sometimes for API reasons and sometimes for language binding reasons and sometimes for licensing reasons and... etc. No one has ever said GPGME is the all-purpose, all-in-one solution. No one. So why are we having this discussion? What was the point in even bringing it up? _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
