It looks like we agree on most aspects, but to get back to the original question of this thread: From what I have seen since the nineties (I do remember donating money for Philip Zimmermann), PGP is great for users with a solid foundation in cryptography, but it is too complicated for avarage users -- no disrespect intended. For more than 20 years, PGP has not made critical mass, and in these years computers and related services have become ever more accessible to average users who don't know about cryptography. In its current form, PGP can be used to improve security in many areas and I am very grateful for the work Werner and others put into it, but PGP does not work for mass e-mail protection, as much as I would prefer matters to be different.
-Ralph _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
