Hi, Reference: > From: "gnupgpacker" <gnupgpac...@on.yourweb.de> > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:45:36 +0100
"gnupgpacker" wrote: > Hello, > > there is a discussion ongoing regarding future of pgp/gpg encryption. > > German ct magazine has postulated in their last edition that our pgp > handling seems to be too difficult for mass usage, keyserver infrastructure > seems to be vulnerable for faked keys, published mail addresses are > collected from keyservers and so on... > > Pls refer to: > Massentaugliche E-Mail-Verschlüsselung gesucht > http://heise.de/-2557237 > > Editorial: Lasst PGP sterben! > http://heise.de/-2551008 > > M.Marlinspike Blog: GPG And Me > http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/gpg-and-me/ > > I am a little bit unhappy about this discussion because pgp still offers > secure end-to-end encryption without the need of a superior CA, no > compromising had been detected so far. > > Your positions to this ct approach? > > Regards, Chris CT is usually a good mag. for technical articles; however back in the 1980s other UK wind bag journalists regularly sold columns with "Unix about to die!" PS Some translator engine links: http://berklix.com/~jhs/trans/ Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
