Am 28.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com>:
> On 28/02/15 14:06, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> but PGP does not work for mass e-mail protection > > Let me stress again that the proper course might be to replace SMTP (e-mail) > and > then work from that. If you have a sieve and wish for something to hold > liquids, > you could plug up all the holes or say "Blow this for a lark" and get a pan. You mean like BitMessage <https://bitmessage.org/bitmessage.pdf>? I think it's the only replacement for mail with cryptography from the start. It gets rid of the whole public / private key problem and also gets rid of spam by requiring a proof of work to send something. -- Jonathan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
