On Wednesday 07 January 2015 at 03:30:55, MFPA wrote: > > But I have seen some of the more > > paranoid privacy folks doing 4096 key pairs. > > I'm sure I have even seen discussions about 16384-bit. I seem to > recall somebody posting where the code would need changing to allow > this, but cautioning such a key would be unusable by virtually > everybody else.
Pointers to the FAQ and discussions: https://wiki.gnupg.org/LargeKeys -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member) Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users