On Wednesday 07 January 2015 at 03:30:55, MFPA wrote:
> > But I have seen some of the more
> > paranoid privacy folks doing 4096 key pairs.
>
> I'm sure I have even seen discussions about 16384-bit. I seem to
> recall somebody posting where the code would need changing to allow
> this, but cautioning such a key would be unusable by virtually
> everybody else.

Pointers to the FAQ and discussions:
  https://wiki.gnupg.org/LargeKeys


-- 
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO)    www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to