-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 5 January 2015 at 10:46:54 PM, in <mid:4f6ce41d-0a52-42b8-a413-159f3505e...@yahoo.com>, Nex6|Bill wrote: > But I have seen some of the more > paranoid privacy folks doing 4096 key pairs. I'm sure I have even seen discussions about 16384-bit. I seem to recall somebody posting where the code would need changing to allow this, but cautioning such a key would be unusable by virtually everybody else. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net She looked like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth - or anywhere else. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUrJpgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwmqIH/i4XQQw/1S+5xgZGO5LkNZCO ReVWnU4dhciwEpE1oOSj1EkT/4XQrW3LJNYtRO944YEktvKS2UUUJniJ7rixEoqa /mzpSmGBD5VZm0YOOanYVceEwMHF8r1+SLZ+Dm9S8z/Sm8KMcvVAIYjrpXSjMN4W CDHfHSDPKXnvcfp6PZ44vqFhwPEiBNhJ6sEbJ0zRQjrUut8LIZWcAyLDxVajf6I7 FX5xLUVBIx7bD1OUGEdmvcjwslkeOWtjH6w1xZgeNwTRqCg+81hhq8ZPrzFwSITN bg6JBpaiPBC/N/AwWtFkLnLEsCvQ7CMAKyAX4drr02HGAP3X9KzAirePHH5az6yI vgQBFgoAZgUCVKyaYF8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45HCMAQDcfyHpszBcnJVLpjb1M2Jt+xWH KB2iRhAFvuIyjAAgCgEAMpjbTs/MS+WuCIpZ/osC/mE15YcXq8qOKZpKpF498AQ= =Xn7S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
