-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Monday 8 December 2014 at 4:50:57 PM, in <mid:5485d6f1.6010...@sumptuouscapital.com>, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > It involve using a hacked version of gpg and generating > a new self-signature, which, as I said is not > worthwhile (as it doesn't do anything practically). But > you have an example in the ML at [0] for the 1.4 branch Fair enough. A new self-signature generated in the normal way by - --edit-key setpref does not have this effect, of course. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net The truth is out there. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUhjuWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwKrAH/1v8plYaL7C3kJSyGg2DPlHr LEhM/mvgTBsUKP1ezopXHC9O6UWn/XQ9Zb+2z80b8ejJo7SUkIyfNvM2GfQn0HHz /xirJoH6q4+l9+/znSSFZZbJ6WAr4jKC7zj4wilsyTjKmBxAVmbs0M2S87yIJWdn r1E8KWtSpglEaZHCoWjO+JVajbipmrMP8IZm6LW0WJ7+6cjG2iDjkuqtO6r48HVS 83zjQIT4oWT7Mfl9k1ZWe7SrJqJEtCVkvLhfoE6C7qKW8rAq3K9vd4mkPvVMM3dF HDJJVQLGRXPVWWcBj0wmzfjNIYTPaYMUyR6TN0Q7SRwYrXGHvInEB5ewqaa6fLaI vgQBFgoAZgUCVIY7ll8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAAKCRAXErxGGvd45IuAAQCEnyTyybB9HQYO9qaW4ttTsbsi QvsjTFuS4VjdMzNKUQEA+ah6anP6FRlfiVz2WGTPbwykKUWc2KNmLxXN4BdPqQY= =tkDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
