Hi Hugo, I did make some test with your last post: Outlook-incoming as Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
If signing “something” (your choice) and resending, signature is broken. If signing „something“ and resending, signature is broken. (Word-2010; incoming Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable) If signing "something" and resending, signature works as expected. (Standard for Outlook-2010, Thunderbird-31.3; incoming Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit) Most used common keyboards are using SHIFT+2 for quotation marks. This results in above shown results, depending on charset and program used. Your (German) keyboard seems to be a scientific one with some additional chars enabled: http://is.gd/nkQQzK My Outlook-2010 (and Thunderbird too) generates "something" by default, not “something” (your choice), or „something“. Settings are set to "iso-8859-1", if new message is generated. If replying, incoming charset is used. I didn't notice such a behavior before!? Regards, Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Hugo > Hinterberger > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:15 AM > > Why break quotation marks "1AF778E4" and "good" or "bad" in OP signature > > verification while answering? > > I use “"” when it is required. In regular text I try to follow > typographical conventions for text. > Nothing seems to be broken on my end. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
