-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello,
signing with two keys in one block can be done. But also, if unequal technology used (e.g. RSA+edDSA)? Verifying of MFPA's signature with Gpg-1.4.18 gave me: gpg: Unterschrift vom 06.12.2014 16:56:22 mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID B31F25F0 gpg: FALSCHE Unterschrift von "0x251BCCEB547B7194" [unbekannt] gpg: Unterschrift vom 06.12.2014 16:56:33 mittels ?-Schlüssel ID 1AF778E4 gpg: Unterschrift kann nicht geprüft werden: Unbekanntes Public-Key-Verfahren Time: 09.12.2014 11:45:53 (09.12.2014 10:45:53 UTC) Gpg-1.4.8 isn't captable using edDAS. In my opinion output would be ok if a new edDSA key has been used!? If RSA signing key has been used, there might be some fault... Regards, Chris (Testkey 0x3e2e0598, DSA-2048-sig) > It seems that you (MFPA) changed your signing practice after I noted that > I can't verify signatures created with your key “1AF778E4”. I did not know > that one could sign a message with two keys in one signing block. > I am wondering if there is a way to collapse the verification result for a > multi-key signature down to a single “good” or “bad” value/result, because > Enigmail gave me some ambiguous message about your signatures. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREKAAYFAlSG1e4ACgkQI4+xq0ppLElTaAEA6HrAxq2sV30uRKp++6c/5zLa mQ62Ec4SeUsUM7H1V/UA/i3pU18f5vZUCY1CYClTHBFLcEyGjeDDY7Z063rrNlTQ =K9bu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
