-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 9 December 2014 at 10:58:47 AM, in <mid:001101d0139f$1b426bd0$51c74370$@on.yourweb.de>, gnupgpacker wrote: > Gpg-1.4.8 isn't captable using edDAS. In my opinion > output would be ok if a new edDSA key has been used!? > If RSA signing key has been used, there might be some > fault... Both were used. For the RSA subkey, the verification output you shared shows bad signature. For the EDDSA subkey your output is the expected result. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net The trouble with words is that you never know whose mouths they've been in. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUh7V/XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwwrcH+gKt9/sW+8btVANrSXIGq2B8 jIvPyL0kDax59DbHNq9IJtPZKWZOhkRQNEarxNot5bJxZ5JJVNT3y3FA7BnGMb2t K757tqUHFlid9UXgnQ4yop8Y10jUrLT5P3QpmhuVIOrtLxGDTqzpTtgSr4vVA+Gb SwjhJsztYufSc9qjxq6KqDOK3mJrSqYxZy6N2M6XqqRPMExOUsSP1TVPf4WA5srN DWKsXowhtSKwgjn5drZYJm17jxPSjLn954OhcZ0huPi5uzfo6rCC27ZsiWQM/9xC pJamhTAdoP/x6hyQq2S65lRgMrYy7z119LqaP1rT7/iFJjyIdOZk5oMWvm5XpGSI vgQBFgoAZgUCVIe1jF8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAAKCRAXErxGGvd45Ma8AQC1lupbEK2+lgxpu1PmMg3ip8Ug pQSEX8eqsCiBIHGWHwEATgPtS7KiSj3mKiHPngp7DNbyLaosbKEeMS+9vCeidwI= =nRKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
