-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 27 October 2013 at 6:42:31 AM, in <mid:526cb5d7.1000...@sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > The NSA never went public with the precise > vulnerability in SHA that caused them to develop and > release SHA-1, but they were quite open and public > about SHA being insecure and needing to be replaced as > soon as possible. Which raises the question in my mind: was SHA really flawed, or was it advantageous to NSA's purposes to have people use SHA-1 instead? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlJtHXFXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pHnID/24t3djRhgG9pu/8jVkDw+noV7ePOohzjNnx NM0r3Aj0uKUBQn6/5cCvfTzUHh7CB942wmeXuE7tAV5nUsRzQ1yGZxRCKcXTBPsO +tF00uK05ja2PWk4HzXbtrrdniOKipbgt3wQVqNFxbWRYevkdBJJlj3cILpptg0+ KW83g2dG =WXTB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
