-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 16 September 2013 at 9:20:45 PM, in <mid:ca+4dsw6ct3buqpp-04+37o0bfcf6xaqozvfh+xehaywg3kf...@mail.gmail.com>, Pete Stephenson wrote: > I consider UIDs > corresponding to no-longer-functioning email addresses > to be invalid and won't sign them as I have no idea if > the keyholder is the actual owner of that address. Doesn't the CAFF method (emailing the key with your signature on just one uid in an encrypted message to the email address in that uid) take care of that for you? Unless the same person has access to both the secret key and the email address, they don't have access to your signature on that uid. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Live your life as though every day it was your last. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBUjozzqipC46tDG5pAQqvxQP+PHgNpjl9joLZQHH2iHXD7MnE3LC65LT1 DlfZd6/IkcwNZWYHJLjr2JXQga5TNSgvT+N1z7sXW/C2Trarg7f55YDVAqe2HwoU CANkwK0acARcYwEl7+bfh+f9ynDc0LoXc7zqTxtJB6h1GZhs6HixImX/lEluduUi B3ONX7K3gc8= =urRp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
