On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, MFPA <expires2...@ymail.com> wrote: > On Monday 16 September 2013 at 7:57:04 PM, in > <mid:52375480.7020...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton wrote: >> I have another philosophy that works for me because I >> prefer not to sign uids that are not valid. > > What, in your opinion, makes a UID "not valid?"
I can't speak for Doug, but I consider UIDs corresponding to no-longer-functioning email addresses to be invalid and won't sign them as I have no idea if the keyholder is the actual owner of that address. -- Pete Stephenson _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
