On 09/16/2013 01:20 PM, Pete Stephenson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:45 PM, MFPA <expires2...@ymail.com> wrote:
On Monday 16 September 2013 at 7:57:04 PM, in
<mid:52375480.7020...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton wrote:
I have another philosophy that works for me because I
prefer not to sign uids that are not valid.
What, in your opinion, makes a UID "not valid?"
I can't speak for Doug, but I consider UIDs corresponding to
no-longer-functioning email addresses to be invalid and won't sign
them as I have no idea if the keyholder is the actual owner of that
address.
Yeah, failure of any of the 3 elements and I won't sign it. I take uids
with no e-mail address on a case by case basis.
FWIW,
Doug
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
