hi Diego We need encryption, because the files are sent via Email from other organisations. These files are then decrypted internally, that's why all/several Win-Users of us.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:51 PM, NdK <ndk.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il 03/05/2013 14:29, Lema KB ha scritto: > > It is not appropriate for us to have several public-private-keys. > Then probably you don't need encryption at all. Or you only need > symmetric encryption (same key used both for enc and dec). > > > Can GnuPG be downloaded on a virtual machine so, that, if one user on VM > > generates a pair-key, this pair-key will be also the keys of other user > of > > this VM? So they all will be able to decrypt files using one > private-key..? > Possible, but stupid (IMVHO). If you think VM access control is enough, > then just use it and don't encrypt the file. > Submission can be handled with a correct ACL (in *nix it could be > rwxrwx-wx on a folder: only members of the group will be able to read > the files in it, but every user can put his file there -- we used this > method for lab projects). > Another way can be a web form that stores an uploaded file in a private > folder. > > PGP is not a "magic bullet": he does what it's designed to do (and I > think it does it quite well), but won't prevent you from using it in > really insecure ways. *SECRET* keys are called that way for a reason. > > BYtE, > Diego. > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
