> timestamp-inter...@gnupg.org I assume. I tried to find the first > reference of it, but several pages of mails indented so that they even > don't show up on my screen without scrolling to the right inhinited > that. In particular I don't known what you mean by P1D.
Well the notation, as you say, wouldn't need to be coded into gpg -- it already supports notations. This is more about choosing an arbitrary timestamp. > So what about a simple option to create all created timestamps with a > time of either 00:00:00 or the creation time of the key? I don't think > that there is a point in having a flag indicating such a faked timestamp. Why limit the choices to 0 and key creation time? How about just an option "--set-timestamp=<int>" that sets the timestamp? Is that easy to do? -- Jerome Baum tel +49-1578-8434336 email jer...@jeromebaum.com web www.jeromebaum.com -- PGP: A0E4 B2D4 94E6 20EE 85BA E45B 63E4 2BD8 C58C 753A PGP: 2C23 EBFF DF1A 840D 2351 F5F5 F25B A03F 2152 36DA -- Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
